Joint National Conference
The Application of Complexity Science
to Human Affairs
Michael Young Building, Open University
Campus,
Milton Keynes,
Tuesday 28th February 2006
Co-hosted by:
The Complexity Society, UK
and
The Open University Innovation, Knowledge and Development
Research Centre.
Home | Speakers
| Programme | Abstracts
| Conference Fees
Innovation in communities – the conditions
for change
Dr Katrina Wyatt and Dr Robin Durie
The aim of this presentation is to share our understanding
of the process of transformational change which took place in
an area of high deprivation in West Cornwall. Using complexity
theory as the evidentiary framework we will show how an area characterised
by isolation and despair has been transformed physically, economically
and socially. Data has been collected through one-to-one interviews,
non-participatory attendance of meetings, access to written documents
and through field note observations and informal conversations.
This presentation will draw upon our understanding gained about
the creation of these enabling conditions producing transformational
health, education, police and housing outcomes.
Top
Representing Complexity - issues for social
scientists in providing evidence for policy and practice in a
complex world
Prof. David Byrne
Unless we regard the scientific description of the
world as equivalent to the religious practice of the contemplation
of the nature of God, then we do science to inform social practice
- to be used. Since the 16th Century the western scientific project
has attempted to deliver absolute descriptions as the basis for
prediction and hence the development of effective technologies.
However, throughout the history of that project, there has been
a continuing expression of 'reservation' as to the appropriateness
of such an approach in domains where the intentionality of human
beings has creative capacity. From Vico through Dilthey into the
social constructionist programme of the twentieth century, voices
have been raised saying 'the human sciences are different'. Complexity
science offers a parallel and related challenge to the predictive
claims of simple science. In brutal summary we can say that both
complexity and the emphasis on human social action assert that
prediction as to what will happen has to be replaced by understanding
of what can be made to happen. This has the crucial corollary
that different things can be made to happen. This presentation
will explore the implications of these fundamental points for
both 'evidence based practice' and the evidence informed development
of policies in the public domain. To a considerable extent the
emphasis on evidence has been understood as enabling the replacement
of political determination of crucial social issues with the technical
resolution of social problems. The contrary argument advanced
here is that what complexity theory requires is a scientifically
informed politics in which real and probably incommensurate interests
are informed as to the alternative futures which can be created
on the basis of the present AND as to what interventions and practices
will produce which futures. The argument will be illustrated by
reference to the role of complexity theory in urban policy and
planning.
Top
Getting value from IT - can complexity help?
Dr Paul Stevens
Following the merger of GlaxoWellcome and SmithKlineBeecham
in 2001, the IT department within the UK commercial company determined
to adopt a radically new approach to IT. This approach focused
the whole department on the generation of value and led to the
adoption of new ideas and ways of working that have forged a close
alignment with other business areas. This close working relationship
has allowed the company to use IT as a truly strategic tool to
become the only Pharma company in the UK to adopt a different
way of competing in the market place, and consequently to greatly
increase sales. My talk will recount the changes that were made
in IT and how they emerged from a simple set of direction-setting
ideas, and will attempt to relate this to Complexity theory.
Top
Is there anything to fear from the politics
of complexity?
Dr Robert Geyer
From a complexity perspective, many of the worst
human excesses of the twentieth century were constructed and justified
by an approach to human beings founded on a deterministic orderly
linear paradigm. Whether this was cloaked in a communist ideology,
the horrors of the an agricultural collectivization policy that
killed 10-20 million in the 1930s, a free market ideology, the
tragedy of the catastrophic impact of rigid IMF/World Bank policy
towards 3rd world debt, or a planning ideology, the appalling
urban housing policies of the 1960s, the fundamentally linear
mechanistic approach doomed millions to suffer under the constraints
of politicians and bureaucrats convinced of the certainty and
“scientific” foundation of their actions. Now, if
Stephen Hawkings is correct and the 21st century is the century
of complexity, what are its political implications and should
we be worried about them?
Top
Complexity and Educational Change
Damian Allen
The Borough of Knowsley is the third most deprived
in Great Britain, and educational achievement is historically
well below national expectations. A series of change initiatives
have been implemented in recent years to improve educational achievement,
which have resulted in significant improvements, particularly
at age 16. The magnitude of this was recognised by the award of
Beacon status for 'Transforming Secondary Education' in 2003-04.
The preponderance of the undertaking has been with the educational
system as a whole, rather than with individual institutions. These
changes have been managed with reference to the concepts of complex
adaptive systems, and the learning from these changes will be
shared. The next series of challenges, focusing around the creation
of a new learning system, made possible by the Building Schools
for the Future programme, will be examined.
Top
Page last updated:
29 June, 2010
|