Organisations, Innovation and Complexity:
New Perspectives on the Knowledge Economy
University of Manchester
9-10th September 2004
Conference
Aims | Paper
Abstracts | Programme
| Further
Information
Predictive Performance of Front-Loaded Experimentation Strategies
in Pharmaceutical Discovery: A Bayesian Perspective
Walter Van Dyck
walter.van.dyck@be.ibm.com
IBM Business Consulting Services and Complex Systems
Management Centre,
Cranfield University, UK
Abstract
Experimentation is a significant innovation process
activity and its design is fundamental to the learning and knowledge
build-up process. Front-loaded experimentation is known as a strategy
seeking to improve innovation process performance; by exploiting
early information to spot and solve problems as upstream as possible,
costly overruns in subsequent product development are avoided.
Although the value of search through front-loaded experimentation
in complex and novel environments is recognized, the phenomenon
has not been studied in the highly relevant pharmaceutical R&D
context, where typically lots of drug candidates get killed very
late in the innovation process when potential problems are insufficiently
anticipated upfront.
In pharmaceutical research the initial problem is
to discover a “drug-like” complex biological or chemical
system that has the potential to affect a biological target on
a disease pathway. My exploratory case study evidence found that
the discovery process is managed through a front-loaded experimentation
strategy. The research team gradually builds a mental model of
the drug’s action in which the solution of critical design
problems can be initiated at various moments in the innovation
process.
The purpose of my research was to evaluate the predictive
performance of front-loaded experimentation strategies in the
discovery process. Because predictive performance necessitates
conditional probability thinking, a Bayesian methodology is proposed
and a rationale is given to develop research propositions using
Monte Carlo simulation. An adaptive system paradigm, then, is
the basis for designing the simulation model used for top-down
theory development. Hence, drawing upon the Complex Adaptive Systems
view of the Complexity Sciences augmented with causal thinking
from Decision Theory, new process theory is proposed explaining
predictive performance of front-loaded, parallelized experimentation
strategies for fuzzy front-end innovation.
My simulation results indicate that front-loaded
strategies in a pharmaceutical discovery context outperform other
strategies on positive predictive performance. Front-loaded strategies
therefore increase the odds for compounds succeeding subsequent
development testing, provided they were found positive in discovery.
Also, increasing the number of parallel concept explorations in
discovery influences significantly the negative predictive performance
of experimentation strategies, reducing the probability of missed
opportunities in development. These results are shown to be robust
for varying degrees of predictability of the discovery process.
The counterintuitive business implication of my
research findings is that the key to further reduce spend and
overruns in pharmaceutical development is to be found in discovery,
where efforts to better understand drug candidates lead to higher
success rates later in the innovation process.
Back to paper
abstracts
Top
Page last updated:
15 August, 2008
|